By The Staff | The Save Jersey Blog
A lot has been said about the new trend of “governing-by-constitutional amendment” that’s taken over Trenton in Chris Christie’s second term, Save Jerseyans, but for veteran state Senator Gerald Cardinale (R-39), the infamous SCR-188 is more than just a threat to democracy; it’s anti-American.
“The marginalization of New Jersey residents through this hastily proposed constitutional amendment is historically anti-American,” the Bergen legislator declared in a statement released Tuesday. “A catalyst for the foundation of this country in 1776 was the rallying cry ‘no taxation without representation’ by colonists devoid of any way of influencing the laws being handed down on them. SCR-188 will have this same chilling effect on the people of New Jersey.”
“By establishing the mandate that 30 of the 40 legislative districts be ‘safe’ or noncompetitive, this constitutional amendment attempts to enshrine in the constitution the thought that 75 percent of the people who vote in legislative elections are going to have no impact,” he continued.
The Democrats’ proposal carries the “continuity of representation” guiding principle that shaped the current map into every subsequent redistricting period. Naturally, the party with a vice grip on the legislature has everything to gain from checking the democractic process.
You can check out the rest of Senator Cardinale’s strong dissent below the fold…
“I urge my Democrat colleagues and fellow voters to think about the meaning of this. With this amendment, the legislature will be able to run roughshod over the citizenry and the people will have very little recourse to voice their discontent with a meaningful vote. New Jersey’s already historically low voter turnout rates will plummet even further when residents know that the outcomes in three-quarters of all legislative elections are preordained by a redistricting committee.
“I have readily acknowledged that the current and past legislative district maps, which during my time in elected office have favored both parties, have not been perfect and that many districts, including the one I represent, heavily favor one political party over the other. However, the issue is not with the redistricting process as defined in the constitution itself and the solution is certainly not to enshrine in the constitution that there should always be uncompetitive races.
“We must instead work to make elections more competitive and that could start by eliminating the eleventh member of the commission who has in recent mapmaking amounted to a partisan vote. I’m reminded of Diogenes who went around his whole lifetime with his lantern looking for an honest man. In New Jersey we also haven’t found that honest man, or unbiased eleventh member, but we have made no attempt to find a way to get that honest man. Perhaps it is time we eliminate the eleventh, tie-breaking member and require the five-to-five member commission to work together, compromise and come up with a fair solution.”
______
He’s right but NJ Democrats are attempting to do what Republican led legislatures across the country do in addition to voter suppression.
Right on Pat!!
Problem is we have too many politians here in N.J.. Change the State Constitution. We have 21 counties but we pay 80 Assembly members and 40 Senators. Change it to 42 Assembly members and 21 Senators and get it back to the same per county not population.
By “voter suppression” are you referring to the case of Black Panthers (i.e., dark-hued Democrats) in Philthydelphia scaring off white voters at polling places?