By Tim Donohue
The morally bankrupt cohorts gleefully celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk are justify their wild-eyed jubilance based on the evil things Charlie Kirk allegedly said.
He was clearly the worst person in the world (besides Trump), so…..
Here’s the problem. Or one of many.
Most of these people never actually heard Charlie Kirk speak. They were told what to believe about CK by the progressive media complex that controls the leftist cocoon of information that drives their myopic worldview. The utterly compromised corporate media, (true to form) fed them distorted versions of the truth and out of context snippets manipulated to paint Charlie Kirk as evil and intolerance personified.
The radical left always attacks what they fear the most. And what they can’t tolerate and despise most are the fearless truth tellers who can calmly and surgically dismantle their failing and corrupted world view.
That was Charlie Kirk. He was changing minds, especially young minds. Not with hate against hate. But with logic and truth. With open dialogue. These are minds that the left has worked to control for generations. Minds they thought they owned. Charlie Kirk scared the shit of them. He unimaginably swung the youth vote to Trump.
So he had to be destroyed. And on the left, the end always justifies the means. We don’t know the shooter’s motives yet. But we know the demonizing of Charlie Kirk was a primary mission of the Left. And we know where historically that too often leads.
Saul Alinsky would be proud.
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
When the only way you can win the argument is by silencing your opposition, by censoring them, dehumanizing them, cancelling them, criminalizing them, driving them off of college campuses and out of public spaces… likely inspiring an evil and unstable individual to murder them – is your argument really work fighting for?
Are you proud of defending this philosophy?
Are you celebrating the devastating consequences?
