Would N.J. dads get billed for newborn ‘skin-to-skin’ time? Probably not

Expectant fathers have enough on their minds without having to worry about bogus charges on their hospital bill. Perhaps that’s why a Utah father’s complaint about being charged $39 for “skin-to-skin” contact with his newborn, delivered by caesarean section, has drawn national scorn. New Jersey hospitals and insurers agreed they’ve never heard of such a charge…

______