What Does Harris Mean for New Jersey?

By Matt Rooney | The Save Jersey Blog

U.S. Supreme CourtMany New Jersey owners of closely-held businesses are breathing a sigh of relief after today’s “Hobby Lobby” decision, Save Jerseyans. Another decision, however, had the potential to generate vastly greater consequences for Garden State taxpayers.

Did it? Yes and no.

You can read the Harris v. Quinn opinion here. Both of Monday’s big U.S. Supreme Court decisions were authored by Justice Samuel Alito, one of the Court’s reliable conservative votes.

The super short version (I’ve only had a chance to skim the opinion, and I make no pretense of being a constitutional expert)….

The Roberts Court stopped far short of overturning Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, a 1977 decision wherein SCOTUS ruled that public employees needed to support the core bargaining activities of the union that represented them collectively by paying dues regardless of an individual’s membership status preference.

In this particular case, the Plaintiff was a mother serving as a home care giver for her son and being paid by Medicaid to do so. Hence, she wasn’t truly a “public employee” despite the fact that her son’s care was publicly funded. Illinois and the SEIU were nevertheless trying to make her pay dues like any other home nurses under the applicable federal program.

Ghoulish, yes, and also a position indicative of the union’s prevailing desire to hold onto power by way of their precious union dues.

Justice Alito, speaking for the majority, said that the facts in Harris weren’t analogous to Abood since the mother wasn’t a full-fledged public employee so, consequently, the Court would NOT extend Abood to cover such circumstances. The power to compel contributions is limited after today, just not ended. That won’t do much to affect the rights of current public employees (and taxpayers) today beyond prevent other non-employee workers from being muscled.

Interestingly, Alito did critique Abood’s “questionable foundations,” leaving the door wide-open for it to be overturned… in the future. That would snap the powers of America’s far-too powerful public sector unions, a power that’s rearing its ugly head as we speak in the ongoing New Jersey pension debate.

For now, however, our best recourse is to elect a GOP U.S. Senate in 2014 and a Republican president in 2016 to ensure that Justice Alito eventually gets to write that decision overturning Abood.

 

Matt Rooney
About Matt Rooney 8442 Articles
MATT ROONEY is SaveJersey.com's founder and editor-in-chief, a practicing New Jersey attorney, and the host of 'The Matt Rooney Show' on 1210 WPHT every Sunday evening from 7-10PM EST.

2 Comments

  1. This was a good thing. It stopped the unions from their power grab. I hope one day that we public workers can truly be empowered and given the chance to opt out of our unions and still keep our jobs.

Comments are closed.