Save Rutgers: Norcross Now Against Merger…No the other Norcross

Save Rutgers: Norcross Now Against Merger…No the other Norcross

I know when you first saw that headline you probably though I meant George. Sorry Save Jerseyans, I didn’t mean to make your heart skip a beat. But honestly, this news is just surprising even if its not as meaningful.

I received a mass email from Rutgers-Camden Chancellor Wendell Pritchett yesterday linking to an op-ed in the Courier Post written by George Norcross’s younger brother, Senator Donald Norcross (LD5). Pritchett praised the Senator for his commitment to the “strong role of the Rutgers brand in Southern New Jersey.” I actually did a double take looking at my phone.

I know Senator Norcross has said this before. After Senate President Sweeney was nearly booed out of the auditorium at the Board of Governor’s meeting last month (which we covered more extensively than anyone else), Donald earned some applause when he made a suggestion that he supported Rutgers maintaining its identity. To be honest, I took it with a grain of salt. I will hold my final judgments for when the time comes to vote on whatever plan is eventually put forward (and that day will come, Save Jerseyans), but I do apologize to Senator Norcross for not initially taking him at his word. He is now on the record as being against the merger that his brother apparently wants.

Norcross advances a proposal that is largely supported, at least in principle, by Rutgers President McCormick and members of the Board of Governors. He would like to see Rutgers stay Rutgers, but to coordinate with Rowan in Camden to bolster each school. It is not a bad plan, I would be interested in know how it would actually work, but if legally and administratively feasible then it sounds like a great form of compromise.

The Senator also rails on Rutgers for neglecting the Camden campus for so long.

We have been cheated for far too long, and this neglect has jeopardized educational opportunities for our sons and daughters. The campus gets little return on the money it sends up the turnpike, surrendering nearly half of every tuition dollar to New Brunswick. Rutgers-Camden is treated like a cash cow while university administrators allocate more money to operate Rutgers’ athletic program than its entire campus in Camden.

It is true that Rutgers Camden receives a paltry share of funding from New Brunswick as compared to the rest of the University, and this is something that should be dealt with. It is most unfortunate that it took the near destruction of the school to bring that conversation to the forefront of the news, but sometimes that is simply how these things happen.

I commend the Senator for speaking out and I hope that he continues to actively support the students of Rutgers Camden who have fought along side us here at Save Jersey to stop this merger. But I also have my own theory.

Over the weekend the Philadelphia Inquirer had a short web posting by writer Kevin Riordan. In part it said,

Ferocious community opposition has politicos walking back from the proposed shotgun marriage of Rutgers-Camden and Rowan universities. The outrage even crosses what in a kinder, gentler era were called “party lines;” the brash young conservatives of Save Jersey are eagerly bashing the Rutgers-Rowan merger, which Gov. Christie supports.

I may have heard something about people in Trenton not expecting the backlash to be anything like it has been, but nothing more. So what could Kevin have been speaking of? Then the Norcross op-ed hit the Courier yesterday.

I don’t want you to get your hopes up Save Jerseyans, but we might be winning this battle. If more legislators down here begin to “walk back” on this issue, then we could see a modification to the initial proposal. Senator Norcross may just be testing the waters for the rest to jump in.

If you care about this issue, and based on the emails I get I know that a lot of you do, then don’t let up.

 

17 thoughts on “Save Rutgers: Norcross Now Against Merger…No the other Norcross

  1. I think the writer is reading too much into Donald Norcross's column. He still stresses that he wants to "liberate" Rutgers-Camden and have it run by South Jerseyans — that is, to say, he and his fellow lackeys.

  2. I agree that he stops short of not supporting fundamental changes to the way Rutgers Camden runs and is affiliated with Rutgers in New Brunswick, but I think it is important to give credit where credit is due for coming out against the initial proposal.

    Seeing someone within the Norcross family backing down on this issue is encouraging, to say the least, but as I concluded, now is NOT the time for people to let up on this issue. Otherwise it will fall back into inevitability.

  3. Don't be fooled!

    Norcross is cleaverly wording "liberating Rutgers – Camden from the north"! The whole of Norcross's message is let south New Jersey control it's own higher education. If Rutgers-Camden is going to continue to be RUTGERS then it doesn't need liberation from Rutgers New Brunswick. Where Norcross may be correct is additional monetary support from both New Brunswick and the state. Hence, providing for the coninued growth of the Rutgers-Camden Campus, as Rutgers.

  4. This is an interesting move, though rather belated. Had an op-ed like this come 6-8 months ago (preferably from someone with a surname other than Norcross–easily arranged, I'd think), it might have sparked a Rutgers-Camden grassroots movement in favor of some sort of reconsideration of Rutgers-Camden's role. Coming at this point, it's going to be part of a larger process of walking this thing back. Probably Rutgers-Camden will tack a future course between the arms of New Brunswick and the SJ pols for as long as possible, to maximize its bargaining leverage.

  5. Admiring the persistence you put into your site and detailed information you provide.

    It's nice to come across a blog every once in a while that isn't the same

    old rehashed material. Wonderful read! I've saved your site and I'm adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  6. I do not know whether it's just me or if everybody else encountering issues with your blog. It looks like some of the written text in your content are running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them too? This could be a issue with my web browser because I've had this

    happen previously. Thank you

Comments are closed.