Save Jersey Electoral College Projection Map (11/2/12): ROMNEY 285, OBAMA 197

Only 4 full days left to go before Election Day 2012 is decided, Save Jerseyans.

Where does the White House race stand?

Seven (7) states changed position since our last projection on October 24th, and all of them moved in Governor Romney’s direction. Overall, Mitt Romney gained a net of eighteen (18) electoral votes over the past week and Barack Obama lost forty-six (46). Fifty-six (56) are still complete toss-ups, but the winds down the stretch clearly favor Governor Romney.

You’ll also notice a common thread this week: early voting analysis. Why? Larger numbers of Americans are doing it every year. I’m still operating under the educated assumption that many national and state polls are skewed (badly) by using 2008 turnout models. Even in those polls, however, Obama is locked in a close, margin-of-error race despite projected favorable Democrat turnout conditions… not good for him!

THEREFORE, my Save Jersey map assumes Obama is in knee-deep electoral doo-doo anywhere (1) early voting is way down, particularly in his key counties, and (2) the President continues to poll well below the 50% mark (since undecideds this late in the game typically don’t vote at all or break in high percentages to the challenger). Mitt’s ground game is as good or better this time according to most reliable sources. Obama needs at least an Election 2008-ish turnout to stay competitive considering how poorly his early vote operations is performing… 

I’ll explain these latest developments below the fold….

ROMNEY 285, OBAMA 197 **

Likely Romney: 66 EV

  • Missouri (10)
  • North Carolina (15) –> from “Likely Romney” to “Safe Romney”
President Obama and Governor Romney both have plenty of $$$ for the next few days, so neither feels the need to abandon any territory by pulling ads. But with the incumbent barely hitting 46% in NC public polling and Mitt pushing 50%, it’s all but over for O in his most surprising pick up of Election 2008.
  • Arizona (11)
  • Montana (3)
  • Florida (29) –> from “Lean Romney” to “Likely Romney”
Likely is a literal designation… the odds are heavily in favor of “x” happening. In this case, “x” is a Romney win. One of the reasons Barack Obama is going to lose this race generally is his poor early voting performance late in the cycle, Save Jerseyans. Florida’s a prime example, where Democrat early voting is down a whopping 70% over 2008. Taken together with consistent Romney polling leads, the state’s strong Republican organization, traditional voting patterns, Romney power in the I-4 corridor and Obama’s inability to escape the 47% range, it’s safe to say that the Sunshine State is a likely Romney win.
  • Virginia (13) –> from “Lean Romney” to “Likely Romney”
My Old Dominion analysis is virtually identical to my FL analysis. Early voting in Obama ’08 strongholds is off by double digits while early voting in Romney counties is way up. He’s not getting what he needs out of government worker paradises in Northern VA. In close traditional “red” states like VA and FL that Obama carried relatively narrowly last time, the President’s campaign needed much larger pre-Election Day margins to prevail in the final tallies. They’re just not getting them, so VA is another likely loss.
O insulting the U.S. Navy in the final debate didn’t help his case with coastal Virginians in key GOP turnout areas like Norfolk, Virginia Beach and Hampton Roads.

Lean Romney: 19 EV

  • Colorado  (9)
  • Iowa (6)
  • New Hampshire (4)
  • Ohio (18) –> from “Toss Up” to “Lean Romney
I campaigned in Cuyahoga County in 2004, folks. I know it well, and it’s important for any national campaign. Extremely so. As the state’s largest Democrat County (containing Cleveland), Democrats need a super majority to overcome GOP majorities in the suburbs and SE Ohio (coal country). This time around… you guessed it… early turnout for Obama is down 15% versus 2008. Early voting is how Obama got 250k votes out of Cuyahoga last cycle (roughly his statewide margin of victory).
When we kept Kerry’s Cuyahoga victory margin to 227k in ’04, that was enough for Bush to carry the state by about 118k votes with gains elsewhere. That mean Obama needs to do MUCH BETTER in the burbs than ’08 on Election Day to make up for his Cuyahoga shortfall in a very close race (all in the face of a much improved, better funded GOP GOTV over last time around). Can Obama do it? Sure, but I’m not betting on it.
Advantage? Romney…

Toss Up: 56 EV

  • Wisconsin (10)
  • Pennsylvania (20) –> from “Lean Obama” to “Toss Up
I’ve said all along that PA could be a toss up if Mitt played for it. He is, so now it is. Both members of the GOP ticket will be there over the weekend.
Unlike most of the other prominent 2012 battlegrounds, Save Jerseyans, roughly 90% of PA votes on Election Day. This means Romney’s major Sunday rally in Philly’s swing-suburbs — coupled with millions of dollars in last-minute ads from Romney and pro-GOP groups, resulting many more ads than the President’s team can muster — could just be enough to produce an epic upset in a state where voters are less desensitized to political advertising and generally favor energy independence.
  • Minnesota (10) –> from “Lean Obama” to “Toss Up
See my Pennsylvania analysis; also consider the under-reported fact that MN is voting on a marriage amendment likely to bring large numbers of religious conservatives to the polls. Similar social ballot questions pushed battlegrounds into Bush’s column in ’04…
  • Michigan (16) –> from “Lean Obama” to “Toss Up
See my Pennsylvania analysis; also consider how Michigan, birthplace of the “Reagan Democrat,” is also home to one of the nation’s largest Catholic populations. They’re not happy with the HHS contraception mandate and will no doubt hear about it from their pastors this weekend. I’m thinking a religious conservative backlash next week can cancel out any lingering misconceptions regarding Mitt’s auto industry bailout position.

Lean Obama: 13 EV

  • Nevada  (6)
  • Oregon (7)

Likely Obama: 42 EV

  • Maine (4*)
  • Washington (12)
  • New Mexico (5)
  • New Jersey (14)
  • Connecticut (7)
* An interesting wrinkle in Maine:
One (1) competitive congressional district (ME-2) might go for Mitt Romney, and because of unique state rules, that elector would go to Romney. The GOP “Restore Our Future” PAC recently made a $300k ad buy up there…
** Methodology:
Mixed. Obviously public polling is my #1 resource (with some private polling info sprinkled in as I come across it from sources). I am not relying on the RCP average, however, because I refuse to consider biased mainstream polls with huge, better-than-2008 Democrat turnout models. +2 Dem in Ohio? Okay +11? Nope! They’re stripped out. I’m also relying on (1) general national/regional trends for 2012, (2) recent historical data/trends, and (3) non-polling info that I’ve either (A) read online just like you, or (B) obtained from a reliable first or second person source. This is half-science, half-art. But what isn’t?


17 thoughts on “Save Jersey Electoral College Projection Map (11/2/12): ROMNEY 285, OBAMA 197

  1. Where is this data coming from? Every other site does not have this, saying Fl, Va, Co Are all tied…

    I get the strange feeling Obama will when the EC, but lose the poupler vote, I dare say some Dem, say that is pay back for 2000.

  2. I'm excluding polls that use '08 Democrat turnout as the baseline. I prefer the hybrid 04/08 model because it's more realistic for 2012. When it's a lean/toss up, I look at factors on the ground (strength of state parties, early voting numbers, potentially influential ballot issues, etc) to make the call. It's half science, half art like all electoral projections.

  3. Thanks for your analysis. I've been a very active political person, in Wisconsin, since 2010. Remember Scott Walker's recall that fell flat? We have a very active grass-roots movement, partly based on the "tea party" movement.

    Romney will dominate Wisconsin with 10 electoral votes.

    A long with Colorado and Iowa, we don't need Ohio, all though I bet we get that state also.


  4. At the same time, you also have to rein yourself in and stay mainly focused on business related topics. The whole professional vs. personal ratio also has to be calculated with your topic and target audience in mind. You should not, however, blog about anything that you wouldn't write in a business email.

    [url =]lv handbags on sale[/url]

    With a little bit more research and time from you, we are sure you'll come up with a profit-building blogging strategy!

    [url =]lv handbags outlet[/url]

  5. You shouldn't take for granted that your feet have not changed since the last time you bought shoes. The shoe sizes of growing kids obviously can change very fast. Actually your feet may continue to change even when you are an adult. Any store that sells basketball shoes will be able to offer exact measurements of your feet. When you try on your basketball shoes, remember that they should fit securely but not uncomfortably tight. You want to have some breathing room, but you don't want your foot to slide around in the shoe at all.

    [url =]NFL Throwback Jerseys[/url]

    Now that you know the several suggestions from this article, your next pair of basketball shoes should fit you just right. Your shoes should feel like an extension of your body when you're playing.

    [url =]Wholesale NFL Jerseys[/url]

Comments are closed.