
Post-Thanksgiving break studies were interrupt by terror when ten were injured (one critically) in a combination knife-and-car attack at Ohio State University on Monday morning.
The deceased attacker?
Reportedly a Somali refugee.
The campus’s self-defense policy? A “gun free” zone.
It’s like a bad movie we’ve seen over, and over, and over again, Save Jerseyans.
But even the facts couldn’t get in the way of triggered liberals taking to their weapon of choice — Twitter — to demand… immigration reform? Knife registries? Something at least remotely related to the actual facts of the actual situation?
Nah. They want tougher gun laws in their favorite safe spaces:
https://twitter.com/JacksonLeeTX18/status/803281737920851968
https://twitter.com/JulieDiCaro/status/803264525936037892
This is even more appropriate considering today's tragic events at Ohio State University. https://t.co/oyWWq5G0us
— States United (@SUPGVNetwork) November 28, 2016
Hoping so very much that everyone is alright at Ohio State University, and that thoughtful gun control can be attained in this country.
— Leon Lazaroff (@LeonLazaroff) November 28, 2016
REPEAT: no shooting appears to have taken place today.
With that in mind, I’d welcome any of the tweeters above (or out there in the Twitterverse) to explain how, in specific terms, stricter gun laws would’ve stopped what appears to be a deranged refugee from waging warfare with a machete and a non-commercial vehicle. Try me. I’m listening.
I’m also tired of writing this post, folks.
Thankfully, for the sake of my sanity, not everyone is clueless.
A group of students has advocated concealed carry on campus as an alternative to Ohio State’s “run hide fight” policy. Let’s hope they make headway after today’s assault.
____